• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
Thursday, September 3, 2026
newsaiworld
  • Home
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • ChatGPT
  • Data Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Crypto Coins
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • ChatGPT
  • Data Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Crypto Coins
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Morning News
No Result
View All Result
Home Artificial Intelligence

Combining LLM Embeddings with Tabular Options in a Unified Scikit-learn Pipeline

Admin by Admin
September 3, 2026
in Artificial Intelligence
0
Mlm combining llm embeddings with tabular features in a unified scikit learn pipeline feature.png
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


On this article, you’ll discover ways to construct a unified scikit-learn pipeline that mixes textual content embeddings generated by a light-weight open-source language mannequin with structured tabular options for classification duties.

Matters we are going to cowl embrace:

  • Methods to generate textual content embeddings utilizing Hugging Face’s sentence-transformers library and wrap them in a customized scikit-learn transformer class.
  • Methods to use a ColumnTransformer to run parallel preprocessing branches for textual content, numeric, and categorical options concurrently.
  • Methods to assemble and consider an entire, deployment-ready classification pipeline on a combined dataset combining actual textual content information with artificial tabular options.

Combining LLM Embeddings with Tabular Features in a Unified Scikit-learn Pipeline

Introduction

Actual-world duties like ticket triage or buyer churn prediction are sometimes addressed by constructing classification fashions. But, in an more and more data-pervaded period, the information used to assemble these fashions and carry out inference on them not often is available in a single taste. We are sometimes confronted with a mixture of tabular, structured information of numeric and qualitative nature, in addition to unstructured information like textual content — for example, ticket descriptions or buyer messages. Feeding these information sorts collectively into machine studying fashions requires efficient and unified pipelines that accommodate the newest information nuances and strategies to deal with them.

This text exhibits you how you can construct a clear, deployment-ready resolution that encapsulates embeddings generated by open-source LLMs (language fashions) right into a unified scikit-learn pipeline, bringing collectively textual content representations and tabular options of distinct sorts — all based mostly on using a ColumnTransformer. For instance its use, we are going to contemplate a classification situation for detecting spammer customers in a buyer base.

Stipulations

As an alternative of resorting to a paid API like OpenAI’s or Google Gemini’s, or a large open-source LLM like LLaMA 3, we are going to use a extra light-weight, CPU-friendly resolution to generate embeddings from a group of texts: Hugging Face’s sentence-transformers. Relying in your operating surroundings, all you could want is to put in the next libraries and dependencies:

!pip set up –q sentence–transformers scikit–be taught pandas numpy

Take away the ! if you’re working in your personal Python IDE slightly than a cloud pocket book surroundings like Google Colab.

Step-by-Step Information

Right here’s what our meant, unified scikit-learn pipeline structure seems like:

Scikit-learn Pipeline Architecture

However first, we want a combined dataset that appears fairly sensible. For this, we undertake a hybrid method: we pull an actual dataset accessible on GitHub — the well-known SMS Spam Assortment dataset containing customers’ textual content messages labeled as spam or not — and increase it with artificial tabular information options. Put collectively, the information will serve us to arrange a buyer churn/triage situation.

The code excerpt required for information technology is a bit massive, however there are many feedback that will help you perceive each choice behind the artificial information creation course of:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

import pandas as pd

import numpy as np

 

# 1. Loading base textual content dataset from GitHub

url = “https://uncooked.githubusercontent.com/justmarkham/pycon-2016-tutorial/grasp/information/sms.tsv”

df = pd.read_csv(url, sep=‘t’, header=None, names=[‘label’, ‘message’])

 

# 2. Encoding authentic goal variable first (0 for regular/ham, 1 for spam)

df[‘target’] = df[‘label’].map({‘ham’: 0, ‘spam’: 1})

 

# 3. Synthesising significant tabular options WITH sensible overlap (noise)

# With out noise and some extent of overlap, the classifier we are going to construct would

# simply obtain perfection: one thing not fairly sensible in apply.

np.random.seed(42)

 

# Account Age: Regular customers may be model new, and spammers generally use older hacked accounts

df[‘account_age_days’] = np.the place(

    df[‘target’] == 1,

    np.random.randint(1, 365, df.form[0]),       # Spam: 1 to 12 months

    np.random.randint(1, 1500, df.form[0])       # Ham: 1 to 1500 days (Huge overlap)

)

 

# Premium Standing: Including a bit extra noise right here

df[‘is_premium’] = np.the place(

    df[‘target’] == 1,

    np.random.selection([‘no’, ‘yes’], df.form[0], p=[0.95, 0.05]), # Spam: 95% free

    np.random.selection([‘no’, ‘yes’], df.form[0], p=[0.80, 0.20])  # Ham: 80% free, 20% premium

)

 

# Precedence Rating: Overlapping distributions so the mannequin cannot depend on this function alone to categorise prospects

df[‘priority_score’] = np.the place(

    df[‘target’] == 1,

    np.random.uniform(0.4, 1.0, df.form[0]),   # Spam: 0.4 to 1.0

    np.random.uniform(0.0, 0.7, df.form[0])    # Ham: 0.0 to 0.7 (Overlap between 0.4 and 0.7)

)

 

# Viewing a pattern of the logically cohesive combined information

df.head(3)

Instance output:

Sample of the semi-synthetic dataset combining text and tabular features

The subsequent step is essential, as that is the place we create the customized textual content transformer — see the leftmost department within the earlier diagram. In scikit-learn, that is executed by making a customized class that inherits from TransformerMixin and BaseEstimator. The requirement is to outline match() and remodel() strategies, similar to any pre-existing information transformation class within the library (e.g. commonplace scalers and one-hot encoders).

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

 

class TextEmbedder(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin):

    def __init__(self, model_name=‘all-MiniLM-L6-v2’):

        self.model_name = model_name

        self.mannequin = None

 

    def match(self, X, y=None):

        # Initializing the mannequin in match() to adjust to sklearn cloning guidelines

        if self.mannequin is None:

            self.mannequin = SentenceTransformer(self.model_name)

        return self

        

    def remodel(self, X, y=None):

        # Dealing with pandas DataFrame (extract the primary column as an inventory of strings)

        if isinstance(X, pd.DataFrame):

            texts = X.iloc[:, 0].astype(str).tolist()

        else:

            texts = pd.Sequence(X).astype(str).tolist()

            

        # Utilizing the required LLM, generate and return embeddings as a 2D numpy array

        return self.mannequin.encode(texts, show_progress_bar=False)

Discover that we specify the Hugging Face sentence-transformer mannequin to make use of — specifically all-MiniLM-L6-v2 — within the constructor technique, and name the mannequin in remodel() to map texts into embeddings.

Subsequent, as soon as we have now our embeddings, we apply the parallel information preprocessing required by the opposite options. Since this depends solely on already-implemented courses in scikit-learn, we will immediately assemble all of the type-specific preprocessing steps into an overarching, unified pipeline. We distinguish numerical columns from categorical ones, making use of commonplace scaling to the previous and one-hot encoding to the latter. Along with the beforehand carried out textual content embedding step, this provides us three processing branches that run in parallel. The way in which to implement that is by way of a ColumnTransformer object that accommodates an inventory of three “processing branches.” This mechanism retains the entire dataset collectively, with out the necessity to manually cut up and re-unify options.

After that, we add the ultimate stage: a random forest classifier. The whole course of seems as follows:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

from sklearn.compose import ColumnTransformer

from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline

from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler, OneHotEncoder

from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split

from sklearn.metrics import classification_report

 

# Cut up information

X = df[[‘message’, ‘account_age_days’, ‘priority_score’, ‘is_premium’]]

y = df[‘target’]

X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)

 

# Outline column teams

text_features = [‘message’]

numeric_features = [‘account_age_days’, ‘priority_score’]

categorical_features = [‘is_premium’]

 

# Construct the ColumnTransformer

preprocessor = ColumnTransformer(

    transformers=[

        (‘text’, TextEmbedder(), text_features),

        (‘num’, StandardScaler(), numeric_features),

        (‘cat’, OneHotEncoder(handle_unknown=‘ignore’), categorical_features)

    ],

    the rest=‘drop’ # Drop any columns not explicitly outlined

)

 

# Assemble the ultimate pipeline

pipeline = Pipeline(steps=[

    (‘preprocessor’, preprocessor),

    (‘classifier’, RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42))

])

Now that we have now assembled the whole pipeline, it’s time to attempt it out! The ultimate piece of code trains the mannequin — a course of that, due to the pipeline encapsulation, implicitly carries out all of the previous information preparations — and evaluates it on the take a look at set we put aside earlier:

# Coaching the mannequin (this can take a second to obtain the HF mannequin and embed the texts)

print(“Coaching pipeline…”)

pipeline.match(X_train, y_train)

 

# Evaluating on take a look at examples

print(“Predicting and evaluating…”)

y_pred = pipeline.predict(X_test)

print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))

Outcomes:

Predicting and evaluating...

              precision    recall  f1–rating   help

 

           0       0.99      1.00      0.99       966

           1       1.00      0.91      0.95       149

 

    accuracy                           0.99      1115

   macro avg       0.99      0.95      0.97      1115

weighted avg       0.99      0.99      0.99      1115

These outcomes are fairly respectable. A part of the reason being that the true dataset used for the labeled texts is thought for being simply class-separable and subsequently not laborious to categorise with excessive accuracy. We additionally deliberately added noise and overlap when creating the opposite artificial attributes to introduce a little bit of problem for our classifier — in any other case, it may need achieved 100% accuracy, which might not be very informative.

Conclusion

This text tackled an more and more widespread drawback within the AI and information science panorama: leveraging textual content information and mixing it with structured information options historically fed to downstream machine studying fashions for predictive duties like classification. We used scikit-learn’s transformer courses and a pre-trained language mannequin to construct a unified pipeline that cleanly and elegantly processes these combined information sorts, yielding a strong and simply reusable resolution.

READ ALSO

A RAG That Says “Not in This Doc” Has to Present 4 Sorts of Proof

3 Methods to Improve Your AI Mannequin’s Interpretability


On this article, you’ll discover ways to construct a unified scikit-learn pipeline that mixes textual content embeddings generated by a light-weight open-source language mannequin with structured tabular options for classification duties.

Matters we are going to cowl embrace:

  • Methods to generate textual content embeddings utilizing Hugging Face’s sentence-transformers library and wrap them in a customized scikit-learn transformer class.
  • Methods to use a ColumnTransformer to run parallel preprocessing branches for textual content, numeric, and categorical options concurrently.
  • Methods to assemble and consider an entire, deployment-ready classification pipeline on a combined dataset combining actual textual content information with artificial tabular options.

Combining LLM Embeddings with Tabular Features in a Unified Scikit-learn Pipeline

Introduction

Actual-world duties like ticket triage or buyer churn prediction are sometimes addressed by constructing classification fashions. But, in an more and more data-pervaded period, the information used to assemble these fashions and carry out inference on them not often is available in a single taste. We are sometimes confronted with a mixture of tabular, structured information of numeric and qualitative nature, in addition to unstructured information like textual content — for example, ticket descriptions or buyer messages. Feeding these information sorts collectively into machine studying fashions requires efficient and unified pipelines that accommodate the newest information nuances and strategies to deal with them.

This text exhibits you how you can construct a clear, deployment-ready resolution that encapsulates embeddings generated by open-source LLMs (language fashions) right into a unified scikit-learn pipeline, bringing collectively textual content representations and tabular options of distinct sorts — all based mostly on using a ColumnTransformer. For instance its use, we are going to contemplate a classification situation for detecting spammer customers in a buyer base.

Stipulations

As an alternative of resorting to a paid API like OpenAI’s or Google Gemini’s, or a large open-source LLM like LLaMA 3, we are going to use a extra light-weight, CPU-friendly resolution to generate embeddings from a group of texts: Hugging Face’s sentence-transformers. Relying in your operating surroundings, all you could want is to put in the next libraries and dependencies:

!pip set up –q sentence–transformers scikit–be taught pandas numpy

Take away the ! if you’re working in your personal Python IDE slightly than a cloud pocket book surroundings like Google Colab.

Step-by-Step Information

Right here’s what our meant, unified scikit-learn pipeline structure seems like:

Scikit-learn Pipeline Architecture

However first, we want a combined dataset that appears fairly sensible. For this, we undertake a hybrid method: we pull an actual dataset accessible on GitHub — the well-known SMS Spam Assortment dataset containing customers’ textual content messages labeled as spam or not — and increase it with artificial tabular information options. Put collectively, the information will serve us to arrange a buyer churn/triage situation.

The code excerpt required for information technology is a bit massive, however there are many feedback that will help you perceive each choice behind the artificial information creation course of:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

import pandas as pd

import numpy as np

 

# 1. Loading base textual content dataset from GitHub

url = “https://uncooked.githubusercontent.com/justmarkham/pycon-2016-tutorial/grasp/information/sms.tsv”

df = pd.read_csv(url, sep=‘t’, header=None, names=[‘label’, ‘message’])

 

# 2. Encoding authentic goal variable first (0 for regular/ham, 1 for spam)

df[‘target’] = df[‘label’].map({‘ham’: 0, ‘spam’: 1})

 

# 3. Synthesising significant tabular options WITH sensible overlap (noise)

# With out noise and some extent of overlap, the classifier we are going to construct would

# simply obtain perfection: one thing not fairly sensible in apply.

np.random.seed(42)

 

# Account Age: Regular customers may be model new, and spammers generally use older hacked accounts

df[‘account_age_days’] = np.the place(

    df[‘target’] == 1,

    np.random.randint(1, 365, df.form[0]),       # Spam: 1 to 12 months

    np.random.randint(1, 1500, df.form[0])       # Ham: 1 to 1500 days (Huge overlap)

)

 

# Premium Standing: Including a bit extra noise right here

df[‘is_premium’] = np.the place(

    df[‘target’] == 1,

    np.random.selection([‘no’, ‘yes’], df.form[0], p=[0.95, 0.05]), # Spam: 95% free

    np.random.selection([‘no’, ‘yes’], df.form[0], p=[0.80, 0.20])  # Ham: 80% free, 20% premium

)

 

# Precedence Rating: Overlapping distributions so the mannequin cannot depend on this function alone to categorise prospects

df[‘priority_score’] = np.the place(

    df[‘target’] == 1,

    np.random.uniform(0.4, 1.0, df.form[0]),   # Spam: 0.4 to 1.0

    np.random.uniform(0.0, 0.7, df.form[0])    # Ham: 0.0 to 0.7 (Overlap between 0.4 and 0.7)

)

 

# Viewing a pattern of the logically cohesive combined information

df.head(3)

Instance output:

Sample of the semi-synthetic dataset combining text and tabular features

The subsequent step is essential, as that is the place we create the customized textual content transformer — see the leftmost department within the earlier diagram. In scikit-learn, that is executed by making a customized class that inherits from TransformerMixin and BaseEstimator. The requirement is to outline match() and remodel() strategies, similar to any pre-existing information transformation class within the library (e.g. commonplace scalers and one-hot encoders).

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

 

class TextEmbedder(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin):

    def __init__(self, model_name=‘all-MiniLM-L6-v2’):

        self.model_name = model_name

        self.mannequin = None

 

    def match(self, X, y=None):

        # Initializing the mannequin in match() to adjust to sklearn cloning guidelines

        if self.mannequin is None:

            self.mannequin = SentenceTransformer(self.model_name)

        return self

        

    def remodel(self, X, y=None):

        # Dealing with pandas DataFrame (extract the primary column as an inventory of strings)

        if isinstance(X, pd.DataFrame):

            texts = X.iloc[:, 0].astype(str).tolist()

        else:

            texts = pd.Sequence(X).astype(str).tolist()

            

        # Utilizing the required LLM, generate and return embeddings as a 2D numpy array

        return self.mannequin.encode(texts, show_progress_bar=False)

Discover that we specify the Hugging Face sentence-transformer mannequin to make use of — specifically all-MiniLM-L6-v2 — within the constructor technique, and name the mannequin in remodel() to map texts into embeddings.

Subsequent, as soon as we have now our embeddings, we apply the parallel information preprocessing required by the opposite options. Since this depends solely on already-implemented courses in scikit-learn, we will immediately assemble all of the type-specific preprocessing steps into an overarching, unified pipeline. We distinguish numerical columns from categorical ones, making use of commonplace scaling to the previous and one-hot encoding to the latter. Along with the beforehand carried out textual content embedding step, this provides us three processing branches that run in parallel. The way in which to implement that is by way of a ColumnTransformer object that accommodates an inventory of three “processing branches.” This mechanism retains the entire dataset collectively, with out the necessity to manually cut up and re-unify options.

After that, we add the ultimate stage: a random forest classifier. The whole course of seems as follows:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

from sklearn.compose import ColumnTransformer

from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline

from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler, OneHotEncoder

from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split

from sklearn.metrics import classification_report

 

# Cut up information

X = df[[‘message’, ‘account_age_days’, ‘priority_score’, ‘is_premium’]]

y = df[‘target’]

X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)

 

# Outline column teams

text_features = [‘message’]

numeric_features = [‘account_age_days’, ‘priority_score’]

categorical_features = [‘is_premium’]

 

# Construct the ColumnTransformer

preprocessor = ColumnTransformer(

    transformers=[

        (‘text’, TextEmbedder(), text_features),

        (‘num’, StandardScaler(), numeric_features),

        (‘cat’, OneHotEncoder(handle_unknown=‘ignore’), categorical_features)

    ],

    the rest=‘drop’ # Drop any columns not explicitly outlined

)

 

# Assemble the ultimate pipeline

pipeline = Pipeline(steps=[

    (‘preprocessor’, preprocessor),

    (‘classifier’, RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42))

])

Now that we have now assembled the whole pipeline, it’s time to attempt it out! The ultimate piece of code trains the mannequin — a course of that, due to the pipeline encapsulation, implicitly carries out all of the previous information preparations — and evaluates it on the take a look at set we put aside earlier:

# Coaching the mannequin (this can take a second to obtain the HF mannequin and embed the texts)

print(“Coaching pipeline…”)

pipeline.match(X_train, y_train)

 

# Evaluating on take a look at examples

print(“Predicting and evaluating…”)

y_pred = pipeline.predict(X_test)

print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))

Outcomes:

Predicting and evaluating...

              precision    recall  f1–rating   help

 

           0       0.99      1.00      0.99       966

           1       1.00      0.91      0.95       149

 

    accuracy                           0.99      1115

   macro avg       0.99      0.95      0.97      1115

weighted avg       0.99      0.99      0.99      1115

These outcomes are fairly respectable. A part of the reason being that the true dataset used for the labeled texts is thought for being simply class-separable and subsequently not laborious to categorise with excessive accuracy. We additionally deliberately added noise and overlap when creating the opposite artificial attributes to introduce a little bit of problem for our classifier — in any other case, it may need achieved 100% accuracy, which might not be very informative.

Conclusion

This text tackled an more and more widespread drawback within the AI and information science panorama: leveraging textual content information and mixing it with structured information options historically fed to downstream machine studying fashions for predictive duties like classification. We used scikit-learn’s transformer courses and a pre-trained language mannequin to construct a unified pipeline that cleanly and elegantly processes these combined information sorts, yielding a strong and simply reusable resolution.

Tags: CombiningEmbeddingsFeaturesLLMPipelinescikitlearnTabularunified

Related Posts

1787689088170 fmrsl0.jpg
Artificial Intelligence

A RAG That Says “Not in This Doc” Has to Present 4 Sorts of Proof

September 3, 2026
MLM Shittu 3 Ways to Enhance Your AI Models Interpretability 1024x592.png
Artificial Intelligence

3 Methods to Improve Your AI Mannequin’s Interpretability

September 3, 2026
1787801771917 78tjda.jpg
Artificial Intelligence

Avoiding Entity Key Drift in a Information Lake: Step 2, When Fuzzy Matching Stops Working

September 2, 2026
1787745270049 h1iwu9.webp.webp
Artificial Intelligence

What We Miss About Lacking Values

September 2, 2026
1787691245458 3eu6qi.png
Artificial Intelligence

Why RAG Complexity Ought to Be Earned

September 1, 2026
Envelopes toQNPpuDuwI v3 card.jpg
Artificial Intelligence

FAQ as RAG: When You Get to Design the Corpus

August 31, 2026

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

POPULAR NEWS

Gemini 2.0 Fash Vs Gpt 4o.webp.webp

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT 4o: Which is Higher?

January 19, 2025
Chainlink Link And Cardano Ada Dominate The Crypto Coin Development Chart.jpg

Chainlink’s Run to $20 Beneficial properties Steam Amid LINK Taking the Helm because the High Creating DeFi Challenge ⋆ ZyCrypto

May 17, 2025
Image 100 1024x683.png

Easy methods to Use LLMs for Highly effective Computerized Evaluations

August 13, 2025
Blog.png

XMN is accessible for buying and selling!

October 10, 2025
0 3.png

College endowments be a part of crypto rush, boosting meme cash like Meme Index

February 10, 2025

EDITOR'S PICK

01967de7 0062 7c28 Bf0c Af7c1790c4a7.jpeg

Bitcoin worth consolidation possible as US Core PCE, manufacturing, and jobs experiences print this week

April 28, 2025
3226101 43046 scaled.jpg

Here is How GCP Consulting Providers Maximize Cloud Efficiency and Scale back Waste

March 7, 2026
1Jt23QI7MgZUlbZCMavDfgg.png

Which Regression method must you use? | by Piero Paialunga | Aug, 2024

August 11, 2024
0qehbc9qy6hcy Dtb.jpeg

Information Science at Dwelling: Fixing the Nanny Schedule Puzzle with Monte Carlo and Genetic Algorithms | by Courtney Perigo | Sep, 2024

September 9, 2024

About Us

Welcome to News AI World, your go-to source for the latest in artificial intelligence news and developments. Our mission is to deliver comprehensive and insightful coverage of the rapidly evolving AI landscape, keeping you informed about breakthroughs, trends, and the transformative impact of AI technologies across industries.

Categories

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • ChatGPT
  • Crypto Coins
  • Data Science
  • Machine Learning

Recent Posts

  • Combining LLM Embeddings with Tabular Options in a Unified Scikit-learn Pipeline
  • Tables in PDFs for RAG: Don’t Flatten the Grid
  • Crypto Commentator Says He Will Purchase Extra ADA Regardless of Rising Cardano Criticism ⋆ ZyCrypto
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

© 2024 Newsaiworld.com. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • ChatGPT
  • Data Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Crypto Coins
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Newsaiworld.com. All rights reserved.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?