Information Tradition Is the Symptom, Not the Answer

Information tradition and knowledge governance are more and more cited as conditions for constructing data-driven organizations. Each are seen as important for turning investments in Enterprise Intelligence and Synthetic Intelligence (AI) into enterprise worth. However right here is the catch: knowledge governance will be actively designed — knowledge tradition can’t.

This text is an in depth deep-dive of the administration abstract revealed on CIO.com. It explores the true function of information tradition when a corporation units out to turn into data-driven — a job which may be fairly completely different from what you count on. Drawing on fashionable organizational concept, I provide a sensible strategy to maneuver past failed ‘knowledge tradition’ initiatives and suggest a mind-set that lastly unlocks the worth of your knowledge and AI investments. 

An appendix offers a Information Tradition Cheat Sheet that distills the important thing factors for instant use.

I’m Jens, a business-minded knowledge skilled with 20 years of expertise serving to enterprise leaders throughout industries unlock the complete potential of information and algorithms.

tl;dr

• Many knowledge initiatives keep behind expectations not due to know-how, however as a result of leaders misunderstand tradition.
• Tradition is an emergent property of a corporation, not an object of design. It may be identified and influenced not directly, however by no means straight formed or engineered right into a desired type.
• Subsequently, in contrast to knowledge governance, knowledge tradition can’t be handled as a prerequisite for worth creation with knowledge and synthetic intelligence. It’s impact not trigger.
• The actual use of information tradition is diagnostic: like a sensor, it helps to disclose the hidden limitations to leveraging knowledge as an asset.
• As soon as the basis causes of those limitations are recognized, leaders can design focused interventions that enhance knowledge worth creation. When interventions have an impact, this not directly shifts knowledge tradition as a aspect impact.
• True knowledge worth creation is feasible when each are thought of collectively: governance offering the dependable basis, and tradition enabling its efficient utility.

Desk of Contents

1 Why do organizations attempt for knowledge tradition?
2 Organizational tradition
  2.1 Limitations of mainstream approaches
  2.2 Definition of organizational tradition
  2.3 Implications for cultural work
3 Information tradition
  3.1 Definition and worth of information tradition
  3.2 Fields of study for figuring out data-cultural limitations
4 Information governance vs. knowledge tradition
  4.1 Information worth creation
  4.2 Distinguishing knowledge governance and knowledge tradition
  4.3 The interaction: A virtuous cycle
5 A device to design and probe cultural interventions
6 Sensible instance — how a better strategy to knowledge tradition can save lives
7 Conclusion
Appendix: The Information Tradition Cheat Sheet
References

1 Why do organizations attempt for knowledge tradition?

Most organizations purpose to turn into data-driven with a purpose to harvest the promised potentials of information being an organizational asset. They purpose to use strategies akin to Enterprise Intelligence (BI) or Synthetic Intelligence (AI) to re-use operational knowledge for analytical functions. Purposes embrace:

• Management: Experiences or BI dashboards are used for monitoring and oversight
• Automation: Duties to handle sophisticated enterprise challenges will be automated
• Choice making: Insights derived from knowledge can generally assist (not substitute!) human instinct required for decision-making to handle complex enterprise issues
• Innovation: Creating insights that assist ask (and reply) the proper questions on prospects, rivals, know-how, and business developments

Regardless of the promised advantages many companies battle to unlock the worth of their knowledge [1]. And this isn’t a brand new drawback. BI, Analytics and AI — not simply giant language fashions, but additionally Information Science and Machine Studying — have been round for a lot of a long time. But, turning knowledge into measurable outcomes stays a problem for a lot of organizations.

Because of this, along with strategic readability [2], the time period knowledge culture is more and more cited as a key success issue for organizations to turn into data-driven [3].

However what precisely is knowledge tradition? Is it actually the precondition for turning knowledge into enterprise worth? And is it attainable to actively form it right into a desired type, such that worth creation with knowledge succeeds?

Since knowledge tradition is in the end a perspective on the general organizational tradition, it’s essential to first align on what organizational tradition is and the way it ought to be approached.

2 Organizational tradition

2.1 Limitations of mainstream approaches

Organizational tradition has been a well-established area of examine in sociology [4, 5, 6] for a lot of a long time. But many executives report that cultural change and transformation efforts are nonetheless among the many most tough challenges organizations face. Though the famously quoted failure price about 70% [7] is topic to debate [8], there’s broad consensus on one level: cultural change is much from trivial and lots of initiatives keep behind expectations. Why is that this the case?

Fashionable organizational concept based mostly on Luhmann’s system concept [9, 10, 11] provides a solution: While many enterprise leaders implicitly assume that tradition is one thing that may be deliberately formed, from a systems-theoretic perspective this isn’t attainable. Consequently, the excessive failure charges of cultural change initiatives usually are not stunning, as many initiatives are designed based mostly on a flawed assumption when taking up a systems-theoretic perspective.

Luhmann conceptualized organizations as self-reproducing, advanced social programs of choice communication. Tradition, on this view, is not an object that may be straight designed, however a latent construction of that means that guides and constrains selections.

Tradition is an emergent product of organizational communication. It may be noticed, perturbed, or nudged, however can by no means be engineered.

Making use of these insights can improve the success price for change and transformation initiatives in observe, justifying the growing curiosity in programs concept for researchers and practitioners alike [12, 13, 14].

2.2 Definition of organizational tradition

Adopting a systems-theoretic perspective right here, organizational tradition will be loosely outlined because the largely unstated and partly unconscious guidelines in a corporation, the latter being a specific sort of advanced social system. Its goal is to tell members of the group concerning the anticipated habits and thus makes sure actions extra doubtless than others.

Organizational tradition determines how issues are accomplished round right here.

Tradition acts as a so-called undecidable choice premise — a filter that turns into more and more essential in advanced contexts, the place people should determine and act increasingly autonomously [14].

Typical examples of such unstated and unconscious guidelines (tradition) embrace:

• Folks assist one another right here
• We deal brazenly with errors
• In conferences, the highest-ranking individual speaks first

2.3 Implications for cultural work

Adopting the systems-theoretic viewpoint offers new insights for cultural work in a corporation:

Tradition is just not the trigger however the impact of prevailing circumstances.

Thus, the idea {that a} ‘good tradition’ is a precondition for profitable worth creation doesn’t maintain [14]. Tradition is best understood as a symptom of underlying issues (or successes) in worth creation.

A number of sensible penalties observe from the systems-theoretic basis for work with organizational tradition:

• Change context, not individuals: Leaders ought to shift focus from altering individuals or their ‘mindset’ to altering context, as that is the larger lever for attaining behavioral change.
• Keep away from culture-design initiatives: Makes an attempt to engineer an ‘optimum’ goal tradition have inherently low success charges and ought to be averted.
• Use tradition as a diagnostic device: Deal with tradition as a sensor for hidden obstacles to worth creation, moderately than a variable that may be straight formed. Use it to uncover the basis causes that specify seemingly irrational habits blocking worth creation.
• Work by way of small interventions and suggestions loops: Design and probe interventions that change the context individuals work in and observe the suggestions, such that the obstacles are resolved. Doable interventions are adjustments in buildings, administration programs, the setup of interpersonal exchanges, or defending (new) methods of working.
• Watch out for blueprints: Organizations are advanced social programs. As such, you can not count on causality. What works in a single context might fail in one other. Subsequently, studying from profitable organizations has usually restricted worth.

The actual worth of tradition work subsequently lies in figuring out unseen limitations, experimenting with small context-specific interventions, and permitting extra appropriate patterns to emerge — moderately than attempting to engineer a desired goal image of tradition, e.g., by way of designed company values.

3 Information tradition

3.1 Definition and worth of information tradition

Information tradition is merely a selected perspective on organizational tradition. One potential definition is perhaps:

Information tradition focuses on the shared habits, values, and casual guidelines that determine how we use knowledge right here to create or shield enterprise worth

As a result of knowledge tradition is in the end organizational tradition in motion, the rules from Part 2 apply: you can not engineer a desired knowledge tradition straight, neither is it attainable to outline common greatest practices to affect knowledge tradition in a desired means.

As a substitute, organizations ought to use knowledge tradition to determine limitations that block using knowledge as an asset, after which probe small interventions which steadily take away these obstacles. When profitable, an appropriate knowledge tradition will emerge by itself, as soon as the worth creation with knowledge is functioning successfully.

As for organizational tradition on the whole, the true worth of information cultural work lies in its diagnostic energy:

• Sensor: Reveals hidden issues in knowledge worth creation
• Lever identification: Factors to root causes as an alternative of signs
• Early indicator: Exhibits whether or not an intervention is starting to work
• Danger administration: Flags unintended side-effects throughout digital transformation

3.2 Fields of study for figuring out data-cultural limitations

The place to start out when figuring out data-cultural limitations? It has confirmed useful to have a look at usually related elements of information tradition. One attainable assortment of such elements are the next six fields of study and their corresponding success patterns that usually seem when cultural limitations are being addressed efficiently. These shouldn’t be handled as goal patterns for knowledge tradition design, however as views to have a look at with a purpose to determine related limitations.

1. Information Consciousness: Leaders and staff perceive each the alternatives and limitations of data-driven worth creation
2. Information Management: Leaders actively demand and champion data-informed methods of working — the place they add worth
3. Information Literacy: All members of the group possess the related interdisciplinary competencies to make use of knowledge in a value-creating means
4. Perception-Primarily based Method of Working: Everybody within the group is prepared to discover and exploit knowledge’s potential for worth creation
5. Collaborative Method of Working: Information and insights are shared willingly and proactively throughout boundaries
6. Information Availability: Customers can entry the info related to them — simply, securely, and in time

These patterns are indicators to watch, not targets to engineer. Their formation signifies that limitations are being lowered and that knowledge tradition is starting to shift as a byproduct of profitable interventions.

4 Information governance vs. knowledge tradition

4.1 Information worth creation

Information governance is one other perceived precondition for organizations to turn into data-driven. However how does it relate to knowledge tradition?

The time period knowledge governance is just not uniquely outlined, however one ceaselessly quoted definition is that of [15]:

“Information governance is outlined because the train of authority and management (planning, monitoring, and enforcement) over the administration of information property”

Utilizing this frequent definition, knowledge governance is especially about implementing processes, roles, and tasks to allow sustainable worth creation with knowledge. It covers the formal guidelines to allow worth creation with knowledge. These formal guidelines will be enforced by administration with argument, rewards, or punishment. It subsequently enhances knowledge tradition.

Information tradition and knowledge governance are two sides of the identical coin: governance brings order to the sophisticated, while tradition creates adaptability within the advanced.

The bottom line is to see knowledge governance and knowledge tradition not as separate initiatives, however as two important modes whose interaction contributes to knowledge worth creation: the continued organizational course of wherein knowledge is used, interpreted, and built-in into selections to generate enterprise worth.

4.2 Distinguishing knowledge governance and knowledge tradition

The interaction between knowledge governance and knowledge tradition is greatest understood by observing it by way of the lens of a robust guiding distinction utilized in organizational design [14] and administration literature [16]: the excellence between the sophisticated and the advanced. 

Information governance is the try and grasp the sophisticated, whereas knowledge tradition is the emergent results of navigating the advanced. This guiding distinction manifests throughout the group in additional corresponding distinctions.

1 Context: Sophisticated / advanced

That is the guiding distinction from which all others observe. Sophisticated contexts are knowable and predictable, even when they’re tough. Their interactions observe clear cause-and-effect relationships. With a ample blueprint and experience, a desired end result will be engineered. Information governance is the first device for mastering the sophisticated, e.g. defining who might entry knowledge or guaranteeing that knowledge high quality is ample.

Complicated contexts are unpredictable and emergent. Trigger-and-effect relationships usually are not clear prematurely and are continually shifting. Information tradition permits a corporation to successfully navigate the advanced, e.g. when staff must determine to handle advanced enterprise issues, they proactively share analytical insights to enhance their choice making.

2 Main focus: The inspiration / the applying

This distinction highlights what every mode prioritizes within the journey from knowledge to worth. Information governance focuses on making a dependable basis. Its major concern is to render knowledge a steady, predictable, and manageable object — the info asset itself. That is largely a sophisticated activity: it includes defining guidelines guaranteeing high quality, and structuring entry in keeping with clear cause-and-effect relationships.

Information tradition, in distinction, permits the efficient utility of that basis within the occasion of the decision-making second. It determines if and the way that steady basis is definitely utilized by individuals to navigate uncertainty and create enterprise worth.

3 Administration: Command and management / dedication by selection

Information governance depends on command and management — the train of formal, positional authority. In distinction, knowledge tradition can’t be dictated. It permits decision-making in advanced contexts by way of dedication by selection: an emergent phenomenon the place individuals observe casual leaders based mostly on voluntarily granted belief and perceived competence [13, 14].

4 Guidelines: Formal / casual

Information governance operates by way of formal, specific, written guidelines present in insurance policies and processes. These manifest as tangible artifacts: written insurance policies, course of diagrams, function descriptions, or knowledge high quality KPIs. 

Information tradition operates by way of casual, unwritten social norms and routines that dictate ‘how issues are actually accomplished round right here’. These manifest as invisible however decisive premises that information motion: the extent of belief in a dashboard, the perceived relevance of information, the willingness to share insights, or the psychological security to problem data-driven assumptions.

5 Selections: Work by the e-book / determine autonomously

Information governance requires individuals to work by the e-book to make sure consistency and standardization. That is execution — no choice required. 

Information tradition helps individuals to determine autonomously within the face of uncertainty. Both by combining the accessible knowledge with instinct, or by asking the proper questions on prospects, rivals, know-how, and business developments, which then requires figuring out what knowledge is perhaps lacking to validate hypotheses.

6 Objective: Stability / adaptability

Information governance goals to create stability, a predictable and dependable basis the place knowledge high quality is constant, entry is managed, and processes observe outlined requirements. This stability permits reliability and compliance and permits organizations to make use of knowledge for choice making with confidence.

Information tradition goals to allow adaptability, the potential to reply successfully to altering enterprise calls for, rising alternatives, and sudden challenges. This adaptability permits organizations to outlive and thrive in dynamic settings and to leverage knowledge in novel methods.

7 Creation: Will be enforced / must emerge

This captures the elemental distinction of their origin and emphasizes one of many key messages on this article. Information governance must be designed and enforced, while knowledge tradition must emerge as an oblique results of the prevailing structural circumstances.

4.3 The interaction: A virtuous cycle

Whereas the first path of affect flows from knowledge governance to knowledge tradition — with governance offering the dependable basis for tradition to emerge — the interaction goes each methods. A powerful knowledge tradition brings the formal, sophisticated buildings of governance to life.

Some examples are:

• Information high quality — Information governance can outline an information high quality rule, however a tradition of accountability motivates an worker to proactively report an anomaly statement. 
• Metadata administration — Information governance can mandate the creation of an information catalog, however solely a tradition of collaboration can guarantee its ongoing curation with the wealthy, contextual, and up-to-date metadata that makes it actually helpful.
• Information acquisition — Information governance can outline the processes for buying knowledge, however a tradition of inquiry continually generates new enterprise hypotheses that want testing, driving the acquisition of solely new datasets by way of these very processes.

This suggestions loop between knowledge governance and knowledge tradition creates a virtuous cycle. The designed, sophisticated programs of governance and the emergent, advanced behaviors of tradition constantly reinforce and enhance one another, driving knowledge worth creation far past what guidelines alone might implement. The sensible instance in Part 6 can even illustrate this impact.

5 A device to design and probe cultural interventions

How can we put the above concept into observe? How can we determine the cultural patterns that hinder worth era with knowledge and AI and design interventions that tackle their root causes?

There are definitely alternative ways to strategy tradition work in a corporation, right here I choose an strategy, which we have now efficiently utilized in our consulting observe. To construction the method of uncovering cultural patterns and designing interventions, we draw inspiration from the so-called Tradition Board [17].

Ranging from a validated enterprise want, the board guides you thru figuring out data-cultural limitations, condensing what you found, designing connectable interventions, and eventually implementing and assessing them. Intimately, the 5 steps are:

• Step 1 — Enterprise Want: Body your guiding organizational drawback clearly. Then hint it to its root trigger to keep away from treating signs. Doc the enterprise want to make sure a shared understanding between stakeholders. Trace: turning into data-driven is just not your corporation want, it is perhaps your resolution.
• Step 2 — Determine: Analyze the info tradition in gentle of the enterprise want. What cultural patterns are in its means? The six fields of study from above may also help to identify concrete limitations.
• Step 3 — Sense: Distill, combine and doc the limitations you might have found to deal with what issues.
• Step 4 — Creating: Design connectable interventions which can be more likely to tackle the limitations.
• Step 5 — Implement: Anchor the interventions successfully and sustainably within the group, then observe and consider their influence.

As a result of success of interventions isn’t assured in advanced social programs — like organizations — , the tradition board is used iteratively: loop as usually as wanted till the the limitations are resolved.

Observe that making use of the tradition board is in itself already an intervention: it exposes staff to beforehand unseen cultural patterns. These insights alone can already set off change and have a optimistic influence on worth creation with knowledge.

The next instance from healthcare illustrates how the tradition board helps put this strategy into observe.

6 Sensible instance — how a better strategy to knowledge tradition can save lives

A hospital faces a excessive price of remedy errors threatening affected person security, regulatory compliance in addition to its strategic ambition to be a pacesetter in high quality of care. A so-called Essential Incident Reporting System (CIRS) is in place to seize and study from near-misses and errors. Nonetheless, it stays largely unused. The few reviews submitted are sometimes too obscure for significant evaluation.

Step 1: Enterprise Want

To meet its strategic ambition and meet regulatory necessities, the hospital should cut back its error price. This requires a scientific solution to study from incidents. The enterprise want is not only to extend the quantity and high quality of reviews, however to create a dependable suggestions loop that measurably improves affected person security. That is the place stable technique work [2] performs out, offering prioritization, administration consideration and the motivation for designing a data-driven group.

Step 2: Determine

Utilizing the present tradition as a diagnostic device, interviews with medical employees reveal a number of highly effective, unstated guidelines that block using the CIRS:

• Worry: “Reporting an error is an request for forgiveness. It begins a seek for a wrongdoer, not a trigger.” This factors to a tradition of blame, the place reporting looks like a private danger.
• Effort: “We’re overloaded as it’s. Taking 20 minutes to doc one thing for a system that offers nothing again is a waste of time.” This reveals a battle with the core worth of effectivity.
• Futility: “These reviews go right into a black field. We by no means hear what occurs with them, so why hassle?” This exhibits an absence of a visual suggestions loop, making the hassle appear pointless.

Step 3: Sense

Distilling these findings makes the core drawback seen: The group’s context is incompatible with the specified studying ambition. Whereas administration formally asks for studying from incidents, the system’s buildings, incentives, and routines truly punish the required habits. The issue is just not the mindset of the employees; it’s the context wherein they work.

Step 4: Creating

As a substitute of attempting to drive medical doctors to raised doc incidents or initiating a ‘tradition change program’, three exact, structural interventions are designed to handle the recognized limitations:

• To counter worry, an information governance intervention: Clear, binding guidelines for a totally anonymized and guarded reporting course of are established. The method is explicitly designed to be ‘blame-free’, a proper assure protected by administration.
• To counter effort, a know-how intervention: The incident reporting platform is redesigned for minimal friction, making documentation as fast and straightforward as attainable.
• To counter futility, an information management intervention: A protected, interdisciplinary studying staff is created, sponsored by a senior supervisor. This staff is shielded from the every day effectivity pressures and has the mandate to investigate the reviews, develop concrete enhancements (like new checklists), and, crucially, talk successes and learnings again to the group.

Step 5: Implement

The interventions create a optimistic suggestions loop. Time to doc incidents reduces considerably. As the primary reviews are dealt with below the brand new, protected course of, employees see that it’s secure and begin offering detailed incident reviews. The training staff can develop and optimize a surgical guidelines based mostly on early reviews, which demonstrably reduces a selected class of error. This tangible success is broadly communicated, proving the CIRS’s worth, reinforcing report documentation additional.

Because of this, the amount and high quality of reviews improve considerably. A brand new tradition of psychological security and data-based studying begins to emerge — not as a deliberate objective, however as a aspect impact of the tailor-made change in structural circumstances.

7 Conclusion

Information tradition is just not a set of values to be designed and rolled out, however an emergent property of the group. It’s the impact, not the trigger, of profitable worth creation with knowledge and AI. In distinction to knowledge governance, it can’t be engineered or demanded.

Keep vital of one-size-fits-them-all greatest practices for designing a ‘good knowledge tradition’. Every group is a fancy social system and reacts in a different way to interventions. It’s emergent — you by no means know what outcomes you’re going to get when following such recipes. What works in a single group would possibly fail in one other.

As a substitute, use knowledge tradition as a sensor. Let it reveal the essential limitations that forestall your knowledge basis from being translated into higher enterprise selections. As soon as these root causes are seen, design small, tailor-made interventions to bridge this hole, observe the influence, and permit a more practical knowledge tradition to take form because of this.

The tradition board is a sensible device for this data-cultural work. It helps leaders floor limitations, design focused interventions, and iterate till the enterprise want is met and, because of this, new cultural patterns have emerged.

Editorial assist (spelling, grammar, wording, literature analysis) was supplied with the help of generative AI. The concepts, construction, and arguments on this article are solely created by the writer.

Appendix: The Information Tradition Cheat Sheet

References

[1] R. Bean, “Why Turning into a Information-Pushed Group Is So Laborious,” Harvard Enterprise Evaluation, Feb. 24, 2022. [Online]. Out there: https://hbr.org/2022/02/why-becoming-a-data-driven-organization-is-so-hard

[2] J. Linden, “How Most Organizations Get Information Technique Incorrect — and Easy methods to Repair It,” In the direction of Information Science. [Online]. Out there: https://medium.com/data-science/how-most-organizations-get-data-strategy-wrong-and-how-to-fix-it-b8afa59f1533

[3] G. Kesari, “Constructing a Information-Pushed Tradition: 4 Key Parts,” MIT Sloan Administration Evaluation, Jan. 23, 2025. [Online]. Out there: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/building-a-data-driven-culture-four-key-elements/

[4] G. Burrell and G. Morgan, Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Evaluation, 1st Version. London: Routledge, 1979. doi: 10.4324/9781315242804.

[5] G. Morgan, Pictures of group, Up to date ed., [Nachdruck]. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage Publications, 2011.

[6] E. H. Schein, Organizational tradition and management, 1. ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publ, 1985.

[7] N. Nohria and M. Beer, “Cracking the Code of Change,” Harvard Enterprise Evaluation. [Online]. Out there: https://hbr.org/2000/05/cracking-the-code-of-change

[8] M. Hughes, “Do 70 Per Cent of All Organizational Change Initiatives Actually Fail?,” J. Change Manag., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 451–464, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1080/14697017.2011.630506.

[9] C. Baraldi, G. Corsi, E. Esposito, and Okay. Walker, Unlocking Luhmann: A Key phrase Introduction to Programs Principle. Bielefeld: Bielefeld College Press, 2021. [Online]. Out there: https://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-5674-9/unlocking-luhmann/?quantity=978-3-8394-5674-3

[10] N. Luhmann, Group and choice. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press, 2018. doi: 10.1017/9781108560672.

[11] J. Tække, “Luhmann and Group Tradition -A Programs Theoretical Analytical Technique Luhmann and Group Tradition -A Programs Theoretical Analytical Technique,” June 2025. [Online]. Out there: https://www.researchgate.internet/publication/392760245_Luhmann_and_Organization_Culture_-A_Systems_Theoretical_Analytical_Strategy_Luhmann_and_Organization_Culture_-A_Systems_Theoretical_Analytical_Strategy

[12] D. Seidl and Okay. H. Becker, “Organizations as Distinction Producing and Processing Programs: Niklas Luhmann’s Contribution to Group Research,” Group, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 9–35, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1350508406059635.

[13] M. Poppenborg, Wir führen anders: 24 ½ befreiende Impulse für Supervisor, 1. Auflage. Berlin: intrinsify.me GmbH, 2021.

[14] G. Wohland and M. Wiemeyer, Denkwerkzeuge der Höchstleister: Warum Dynamikrobuste Unternehmen Marktdruck Erzeugen, 1st ed. UNIBUCH VERLAG, 2014.

[15] D. Henderson, S. Earley, C. Bradley, and Information Administration Administration Affiliation, Eds., DAMA-DMBOK: knowledge administration physique of data, Second

[16] D. J. Snowden and M. E. Boone, “A Chief’s Framework for Choice Making,” Harvard Enterprise Evaluation, Nov. 2007. [Online]. Out there: https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making

[17] F. Heuer and O. Kruggel, Der Kulturarchitekt: mit dem Tradition Board Unternehmenskultur analysieren und verändern, 1. Auflage. Düsseldorf: Fachmedien Otto Schmidt KG, 2022.