In Half 1 of this sequence, how Azure and AWS take basically totally different approaches to machine studying challenge administration and knowledge storage.
Azure ML makes use of a workspace-centric construction with user-level role-based entry management (RBAC), the place permissions are granted to people based mostly on their obligations. In distinction, AWS SageMaker adopts a job-centric structure that decouples consumer permissions from job execution, granting entry on the job degree by IAM roles. For knowledge storage, Azure ML depends on datastores and knowledge belongings inside workspaces to handle connections and credentials behind the scenes, whereas AWS SageMaker integrates immediately with S3 buckets, requiring specific permission grants for SageMaker execution roles to entry knowledge.
Discover out extra on this article:
Having established how these platforms deal with challenge setup and knowledge entry, in Half 2, we’ll study the compute assets and runtime environments that energy the mannequin coaching jobs.
Compute
Compute is the digital machine the place your mannequin and code run. Together with community and storage, it is without doubt one of the basic constructing blocks of cloud computing. Compute assets sometimes characterize the most important value element of an ML challenge, as coaching fashions—particularly giant AI fashions—requires lengthy coaching instances and sometimes specialised compute cases (e.g., GPU cases) with larger prices. Subsequently, Azure ML designs a devoted AzureML Compute Operator position (see particulars in Half 1) for managing compute assets.
Azure and AWS supply numerous occasion sorts that differ within the variety of CPUs/GPUs, reminiscence, disk area and sort, every designed for particular functions. Each platforms use a pay-as-you-go pricing mannequin, charging just for energetic compute time.
Azure digital machine sequence are named in alphabetic order; for example, D household VMs are designed for general-purpose workloads and meet the necessities for many growth and manufacturing environments. AWS compute cases are additionally grouped into households based mostly on their goal; for example, the m5 household incorporates general-purpose cases for SageMaker ML growth. The desk under compares compute cases supplied by Azure and AWS based mostly on their goal, hourly pricing and typical use circumstances. (Please notice that the pricing construction varies by area and plan, so I like to recommend trying out their official web sites.)

Now that we’ve in contrast compute pricing in AWS and Azure, let’s discover how the 2 platforms differ in integrating compute assets into ML methods.
Azure ML

Computes are persistent assets within the Azure ML Workspace, sometimes created as soon as by the AzureML Compute Operator and reused by the information science crew. Since compute assets are cost-intensive, this construction permits them to be centrally managed by a job with cloud infrastructure experience, whereas knowledge scientists and engineers can deal with growth work.
Azure gives a spectrum of compute goal choices designated for ML growth and deployment, relying on the size of the workload. A compute occasion is a single-node machine appropriate for interactive growth and testing within the Jupyter pocket book atmosphere. A compute cluster is one other kind of compute goal that spins up multi-node cluster machines. It may be scaled for parallel processing based mostly on workload demand and helps auto-scaling by configuring the parameter min_instances and max_instances. Moreover, there are severless compute, Kubernetes clusters, and containers which can be match for various functions. Here’s a helpful visible abstract that helps you make the choice based mostly in your use case.
” image from “[Explore and configure the Azure Machine Learning workspace DP-100](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f5dlIvI5LQ)”](https://contributor.insightmediagroup.io/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-2-1024x477.png)
To create an Azure ML managed compute goal we create an AmlCompute object utilizing the code under:
kind: use"amlcompute"for compute cluster. Alternatively, use"computeinstance"for single-node interactive growth and“kubernetes"for AKS clusters.title: specify the compute goal title.dimension: specify the occasion dimension.min_instancesandmax_instances(non-obligatory): set the vary of cases allowed to run concurrently.idle_time_before_scale_down(non-obligatory): routinely shut down the compute cluster when idle to keep away from incurring pointless prices.
# Create a compute cluster
cpu_cluster = AmlCompute(
title="cpu-cluster",
kind="amlcompute",
dimension="Standard_DS3_v2",
min_instances=0,
max_instances=4,
idle_time_before_scale_down=120
)
# Create or replace the compute
ml_client.compute.begin_create_or_update(cpu_cluster)
As soon as the compute useful resource is created, anybody within the shared Workspace can use it by merely referencing its title in an ML job, making it simply accessible for crew collaboration.
# Use the continued compute "cpu-cluster" within the job
job = command(
code='./src',
command='python code.py',
compute='cpu-cluster',
display_name='train-custom-env',
experiment_name='coaching'
)
AWS SageMaker AI

Compute assets are managed by a standalone AWS service – EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud). When utilizing these compute assets in SageMaker, it require builders to explicitly configure the occasion kind for every job, then compute cases are created on-demand and terminated when the job finishes. This strategy offers builders extra flexibility over compute choice based mostly on activity, however requires extra infrastructure data to pick out and handle the suitable compute useful resource. For instance, out there occasion sorts differ by job kind. ml.t3.medium and ml.t3.giant are generally used for powering SageMaker notebooks in interactive growth environments, however they aren’t out there for coaching jobs, which require extra highly effective occasion sorts from the m5, c5, p3, or g4dn households.
As proven within the code snippet under, AWS SageMaker specifies the compute occasion and the variety of cases working concurrently as job parameters. A compute occasion with the ml.m5.xlarge kind is created throughout job execution and charged based mostly on the job runtime.
estimator = Estimator(
image_uri=image_uri,
position=position,
instance_type="ml.m5.xlarge",
instance_count=1
)
SageMaker jobs spin up on-demand cases by default. They’re charged by seconds and supplies assured capability for working time-sensitive jobs. For jobs that may tolerate interruptions and better latency, spot occasion is a extra cost-saving possibility that makes use of unused compute cases. The draw back is the extra ready interval when there aren’t any out there spot cases. We use the code snippet under to implement a spot occasion possibility for a coaching job.
use_spot_instances: set asTrueto make use of spot cases, in any other case default to on-demandmax_wait: the utmost period of time you’re prepared to attend for out there spot cases (ready time is just not charged)max_run: the utmost quantity of coaching time allowed for the jobcheckpoint_s3_uri: the S3 bucket URI path to save lots of mannequin checkpoints, in order that coaching can safely restart after ready
estimator = Estimator(
image_uri=image_uri,
position=position,
instance_type="ml.m5.xlarge",
instance_count=1,
use_spot_instances=True,
max_run=3600,
max_wait=7200,
checkpoint_s3_uri=""
)
What does this imply in apply?
- Azure ML: Azure’s persistent compute strategy permits centralized administration and sharing throughout a number of builders, permitting knowledge scientists to deal with mannequin growth moderately than infrastructure administration.
- AWS SageMaker AI: SageMaker requires builders to explicitly outline compute occasion kind for every job, offering extra flexibility but additionally demanding deeper infrastructure data of occasion sorts, prices and availability constraints.
Reference
Surroundings
Surroundings defines the place the code or job is run, together with software program, working system, program packages, docker picture and atmosphere variables. Whereas compute is answerable for the underlying infrastructure and {hardware} picks, atmosphere setup is essential in guaranteeing constant and reproducible behaviors throughout growth and manufacturing atmosphere, mitigating package deal conflicts and dependency points when executing the identical code in numerous runtime setup by totally different builders. Azure ML and SageMaker each help utilizing their curated environments and organising {custom} environments.
Azure ML
Much like Information and Compute, Surroundings is taken into account a sort of useful resource and asset within the Azure ML Workspace. Azure ML gives a complete checklist of curated environments for common python frameworks (e.g. PyTorch, Tensorflow, scikit-learn) designed for CPU or GPU/CUDA goal.
The code snippet under helps to retrieve the checklist of all curated environments in Azure ML. They typically comply with a naming conference that features the framework title, model, working system, Python model, and compute goal (CPU/GPU), e.g.AzureML-sklearn-1.0-ubuntu20.04-py38-cpu signifies scikit-learn model 1.0, working on Ubuntu 20.04 with Python 3.8 for CPU compute.
envs = ml_client.environments.checklist()
for env in envs:
print(env.title)
# >>> Auzre ML Curated Environments
"""
AzureML-AI-Studio-Improvement
AzureML-ACPT-pytorch-1.13-py38-cuda11.7-gpu
AzureML-ACPT-pytorch-1.12-py38-cuda11.6-gpu
AzureML-ACPT-pytorch-1.12-py39-cuda11.6-gpu
AzureML-ACPT-pytorch-1.11-py38-cuda11.5-gpu
AzureML-ACPT-pytorch-1.11-py38-cuda11.3-gpu
AzureML-responsibleai-0.21-ubuntu20.04-py38-cpu
AzureML-responsibleai-0.20-ubuntu20.04-py38-cpu
AzureML-tensorflow-2.5-ubuntu20.04-py38-cuda11-gpu
AzureML-tensorflow-2.6-ubuntu20.04-py38-cuda11-gpu
AzureML-tensorflow-2.7-ubuntu20.04-py38-cuda11-gpu
AzureML-sklearn-1.0-ubuntu20.04-py38-cpu
AzureML-pytorch-1.10-ubuntu18.04-py38-cuda11-gpu
AzureML-pytorch-1.9-ubuntu18.04-py37-cuda11-gpu
AzureML-pytorch-1.8-ubuntu18.04-py37-cuda11-gpu
AzureML-sklearn-0.24-ubuntu18.04-py37-cpu
AzureML-lightgbm-3.2-ubuntu18.04-py37-cpu
AzureML-pytorch-1.7-ubuntu18.04-py37-cuda11-gpu
AzureML-tensorflow-2.4-ubuntu18.04-py37-cuda11-gpu
AzureML-Triton
AzureML-Designer-Rating
AzureML-VowpalWabbit-8.8.0
AzureML-PyTorch-1.3-CPU
"""
To run the coaching job in a curated atmosphere, we create an atmosphere object by referencing its title and model, then passing it as a job parameter.
# Get an curated Surroundings
atmosphere = ml_client.environments.get("AzureML-sklearn-1.0-ubuntu20.04-py38-cpu", model=44)
# Use the curated atmosphere in Job
job = command(
code=".",
command="python prepare.py",
atmosphere=atmosphere,
compute="cpu-cluster"
)
ml_client.jobs.create_or_update(job)
Alternatively, create a {custom} atmosphere from a Docker picture registered in Docker Hob utilizing the code snippet under.
# Get an curated Surroundings
atmosphere = ml_client.environments.get("AzureML-sklearn-1.0-ubuntu20.04-py38-cpu", model=44)
# Use the curated atmosphere in Job
job = command(
code=".",
command="python prepare.py",
atmosphere=atmosphere,
compute="cpu-cluster"
)
ml_client.jobs.create_or_update(job)
AWS SageMaker AI
SageMaker’s atmosphere configuration is tightly coupled with job definitions, providing three ranges of customization to ascertain the OS, frameworks and packages required for job execution. These are Constructed-in Algorithm, Convey Your Personal Script (Script mode) and Convey Your Personal Container (BYOC), starting from the most straightforward but inflexible choice to essentially the most complicated but customizable possibility.
Constructed-in Algorithms

That is the choice with the least quantity of effort for builders to coach and deploy machine studying fashions at scale in AWS SageMaker and Azure at the moment doesn’t supply an equal built-in algorithm strategy utilizing Python SDK as of February 2026.
SageMaker encapsulates the machine studying algorithm, in addition to its python library and framework dependencies inside an estimator object. For instance, right here we instantiate a KMeans estimator by specifying the algorithm-specific hyperparameter okay and passing the coaching knowledge to suit the mannequin. Then the coaching job will spin up a ml.m5.giant compute occasion and the educated mannequin will probably be saved within the output location.
Convey Your Personal Script

The convey your individual script strategy (also called script mode or convey your individual mannequin) permits builders to leverage SageMaker’s prebuilt containers for common python frameworks for machine studying like scikit-learn, PyTorch and Tensorflow. It supplies the pliability of customizing the coaching job by your individual script with out the necessity of managing the job execution atmosphere, making it the most well-liked alternative when utilizing specialised algorithms not included in SageMaker’s built-in choices.
Within the instance under, we instantiate an estimator utilizing the scikit-learn framework by offering a {custom} coaching script prepare.py, the mannequin’s hyperparameters, together with the framework model and python model.
from sagemaker.sklearn import SKLearn
sk_estimator = SKLearn(
entry_point="prepare.py",
position=position,
instance_count=1,
instance_type="ml.m5.giant",
py_version="py3",
framework_version="1.2-1",
script_mode=True,
hyperparameters={"estimators": 20},
)
# Practice the estimator
sk_estimator.match({"prepare": training_data})
Convey Your Personal Container
That is the strategy with the best degree of customization, which permits builders to convey a {custom} atmosphere utilizing a Docker picture. It fits situations that depend on unsupported python frameworks, specialised packages, or different programming languages (e.g. R, Java and so on). The workflow includes constructing a Docker picture that incorporates all required package deal dependencies and mannequin coaching scripts, then push it to Elastic Container Registry (ECR), which is AWS’s container registry service equal to Docker Hub.
Within the code under, we specify the {custom} docker picture URI as a parameter to create the estimator and match the estimator with coaching knowledge.
from sagemaker.estimator import Estimator
image_uri = ":"
byoc_estimator = Estimator(
image_uri=image_uri,
position=position,
instance_count=1,
instance_type="ml.m5.giant",
output_path=" ",
sagemaker_session=sess,
)
byoc_estimator.match(training_data)
What does it imply in apply?
- Azure ML: Supplies help for working coaching jobs utilizing its in depth assortment of curated environments that cowl common frameworks equivalent to PyTorch, TensorFlow, and scikit-learn, in addition to providing the potential to construct and configure {custom} environments from Docker photos for extra specialised use circumstances. Nonetheless, you will need to notice that Azure ML doesn’t at the moment supply the built-in algorithm strategy that encapsulates and packages common machine studying algorithms immediately into the atmosphere in the identical manner that SageMaker does.
- AWS SageMaker AI: SageMaker is thought for its three degree of customizations—Constructed-in Algorithm, Convey Your Personal Script, Convey Your Personal Container—which cowl a spectrum of builders necessities. Constructed-in Algorithm and Convey Your Personal Script use AWS’s managed environments and combine tightly with ML algorithms or frameworks. They provide simplicity however are much less appropriate for extremely specialised mannequin coaching processes.
In Abstract
Primarily based on the comparisons of Compute and Surroundings above together with what we mentioned in AWS vs. Azure: A Deep Dive into Mannequin Coaching — Half 1 (Undertaking Setup and Information Storage), we’d have realized the 2 platforms undertake totally different design rules to construction their machine studying ecosystems.
Azure ML follows a extra modular structure the place Information, Compute, and Surroundings are handled as impartial assets and belongings inside the Azure ML Workspace. Since they are often configured and managed individually, this strategy is extra beginner-friendly, particularly for customers with out in depth cloud computing or permission administration data. For example, an information scientist can create a coaching job by attaching an current compute within the Workspace while not having infrastructural experience to handle compute cases.
AWS SageMaker has a steeper studying curve, as a number of companies are tightly coupled and orchestrated collectively as a holistic system for ML job execution. Nonetheless, this job-centric strategy gives clear separation between mannequin coaching and mannequin deployment environments, in addition to the flexibility for distributed coaching at scale. By giving builders extra infrastructure management, SageMaker is nicely fitted to large-scale knowledge science and AI groups with excessive MLOps maturity and the necessity of CI/CD pipelines.
Take-Dwelling Message
On this sequence, we evaluate the 2 hottest cloud platforms Azure and AWS for scalable mannequin coaching, breaking down the comparability into the next dimensions:
- Undertaking and Permission Administration
- Information storage
- Compute
- Surroundings
In Half 1, we mentioned high-level challenge setup and permission administration, then talked about storing and accessing the information required for mannequin coaching.
In Half 2, we examined how Azure ML’s persistent, workspace-centric compute assets differ from AWS SageMaker’s on-demand, job-specific strategy. Moreover, we explored atmosphere customization choices, from Azure’s curated environments and {custom} environments to SageMaker’s three degree of customizations—Constructed-in Algorithm, Convey Your Personal Script, Convey Your Personal Container. This comparability reveals Azure ML’s modular, beginner-friendly structure vs. SageMaker’s built-in, job-centric design that provides better scalability and infrastructure management for groups with MLOps necessities.
















